By the mid-1990s, we had learned a great deal about what interviewers should do when conducting investigative interviews with suspected victims of child abuse and we had learned a lot about what interviewers should not do in those interviews. Many experts conducted trainings and gave lectures explaining what interviewers should and should not do. Trainees nodded sagely. The information was clear. They understood. However, when they came to conducting interviews, all that learning seemed to disappear.
It was in this context that the NICHD Protocol was developed. It aimed to provide clear and concrete guidance about what interviewers should aim to do when interviewing suspected victims. Because experience and research had shown that simply knowing conceptually what to do or not do was insufficient, the Protocol provided many examples and concrete suggestions. All of the guidance was based on years of research showing how to make is easiest for children in these situations to understand their roles and those of the interviewer, and the specific questions they were asked; how to feel comfortable in the unfamiliar context, how to retrieve memories of experienced events from memory, how to provide detailed accounts of those experienced events, how to respond to unusually open questions. To help the interviewers avoid distracting the children and contaminating their responses, the Protocol also set up a structure to ensure that they provided the best possible scaffold to assist the children and make sure that, if they did ask more risky questions, they did so as late as possible so any damage was minimized.
The final version of the Protocol was completed in the late 1990s. A number of studies, using the Hebrew, English, and French translations, showed that use of the Protocol was associated with better quality interviewing and the elicitation of richer and clearer information about the young children’s experiences. In this portion of the website, you can find the text of the Protocol in a variety of languages. All have been translated and back translated to ensure that the spirit of the Protocol has been preserved. This Protocol is referred to here as the Standard Protocol to distinguish it from the Revised Protocol which was developed later.
It is important to make clear that effective use of the Standard Protocol depends on extensive training, including guidance from peers and other experts. Simply reading the Protocol before using it does not ensure high quality interviewing.
< read more ... >